From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:54:05 +0100
Message-ID: <20070213155405.GA33765@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
References: <20070207173414.GA64492@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <1170871661.3415.36.camel@raven.themaw.net> <20070207181817.GA75717@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <1170901990.3383.18.camel@raven.themaw.net> <1171262594.18376.13.camel@raven.themaw.net> <20070212135749.GA1681@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <1171327959.3377.3.camel@raven.themaw.net> <20070213085053.GA74257@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <45D1C61F.9090509@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1750753AbXBMPyI@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45D1C61F.9090509@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>, "Hack inc." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, autofs@linux.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:07:27AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:52:39AM +0900, Ian Kent wrote:
> >> Indeed.
> >> Which kernel can you use?
> >> I believe that 2200 had another problem so can you use an fc5 kernel
> >> later than that?
> > 
> > I've ported your patch to 2257 (nothing special, only moved lines),
> > and it seems to work beautifully.  I'm enlarging the testing.
> > 
> 
> If you get the patches into -stable they will end up in Fedora
> kernels automatically. 2288 (based on 2.6.19) is in testing now...

Don't they require autofs5 to be of any use though?  That's not going
to be in fc until it's out of beta I guess.

  OG.