From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] Marking obsolete-deprecated stuff
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:35:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070214193524.GF17598@distanz.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1264e020702140722x511bc01ajc6ccbd4eb2816f05@mail.gmail.com>
On 2007-02-14 at 18:32:00 +0100, yaman <yamanc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry about the re-send, non-attached version :)
> For marking obsolete-deprecated stuff, compiles fine for arm. If
> that's the way to go i can complete the rest.
Unfortunately your patch got line-wrapped
> Signed-off-by: Yaman Cakmakci <yamanc@gmail.com <mailto:yamanc@gmail.com>>
Just the email without mailto: will do here.
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20-vanilla/Documentation/dontdiff
> linux-2.6.20-vanilla/arch/arm/kernel/compat.c
> linux-2.6.20/arch/arm/kernel/compat.c
> --- linux-2.6.20-vanilla/arch/arm/kernel/compat.c 2006-09-20
> 06:42:06.000000000 +0300
> +++ linux-2.6.20/arch/arm/kernel/compat.c 2007-02-14
> 15:43:03.000000000 +0200
> @@ -38,8 +38,9 @@
> * guaranteed to contain useful data in setup_arch()
> *
> * This is the old deprecated way to pass parameters to the kernel
> + * Should've been obsoleted by now, as it's 2007 now
Nitpicking: Two times 'now' in the same sentence. Might need some
readjustment ;)
> */
> -struct param_struct {
> +struct __deprecated param_struct {
> union {
> struct {
> unsigned long page_size; /* 0 */
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20-vanilla/Documentation/dontdiff
> linux-2.6.20-vanilla/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c linux-2.6.20/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> --- linux-2.6.20-vanilla/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c 2007-02-14
> 15:12:18.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.20/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c 2007-02-14 15:49:33.000000000 +0200
> @@ -117,18 +117,16 @@ static void __init early_cachepolicy(cha
> }
> __early_param("cachepolicy=", early_cachepolicy);
>
> -static void __init early_nocache(char **__unused)
> +__deprecated static void __init early_nocache(char **__unused)
Storage class should always be first.
> {
> char *p = "buffered";
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "nocache is deprecated; use cachepolicy=%s\n", p);
> early_cachepolicy(&p);
> }
> __early_param("nocache", early_nocache);
>
> -static void __init early_nowrite(char **__unused)
> +__deprecated static void __init early_nowrite(char **__unused)
Ditto.
> {
> char *p = "uncached";
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "nowb is deprecated; use cachepolicy=%s\n", p);
> early_cachepolicy(&p);
> }
> __early_param("nowb", early_nowrite);
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20-vanilla/Documentation/dontdiff
> linux-2.6.20-vanilla/arch/arm26/kernel/compat.c
> linux-2.6.20/arch/arm26/kernel/compat.c
> --- linux-2.6.20-vanilla/arch/arm26/kernel/compat.c 2006-09-20
> 06:42:06.000000000 +0300
> +++ linux-2.6.20/arch/arm26/kernel/compat.c 2007-02-14
> 15:52:30.000000000 +0200
> @@ -38,8 +38,9 @@
> * guaranteed to contain useful data in setup_arch()
> *
> * This is the old deprecated way to pass parameters to the kernel
> + * Should've been obsoleted by now, as it's 2007 now
Same as above.
> */
> -struct param_struct {
> +struct __deprecated param_struct {
> union {
> struct {
> unsigned long page_size; /* 0 */
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20-vanilla/Documentation/dontdiff
> linux-2.6.20-vanilla/arch/arm26/kernel/setup.c
> linux-2.6.20/arch/arm26/kernel/setup.c
> --- linux-2.6.20-vanilla/arch/arm26/kernel/setup.c 2007-02-14
> 15:04:16.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.20/arch/arm26/kernel/setup.c 2007-02-14
> 15:56:57.000000000 +0200
> @@ -354,9 +354,8 @@ static int __init parse_tag_ramdisk(cons
>
> __tagtable(ATAG_RAMDISK, parse_tag_ramdisk);
>
> -static int __init parse_tag_initrd(const struct tag *tag)
> +__deprecated static int __init parse_tag_initrd(const struct tag *tag)
Storage class again.
> {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "ATAG_INITRD is deprecated; please update your
> bootloader. \n");
> phys_initrd_start = (unsigned long)tag->u.initrd.start;
> phys_initrd_size = (unsigned long)tag->u.initrd.size;
> return 0;
> @@ -364,9 +363,8 @@ static int __init parse_tag_initrd(const
>
> __tagtable(ATAG_INITRD, parse_tag_initrd);
>
> -static int __init parse_tag_initrd2(const struct tag *tag)
> +__deprecated static int __init parse_tag_initrd2(const struct tag *tag)
And yet again.
Cheers, Tobias
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-14 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-14 15:22 [KJ] [PATCH] Marking obsolete-deprecated stuff Yaman
2007-02-14 17:32 ` yaman
2007-02-14 19:35 ` Tobias Klauser [this message]
2007-02-14 22:24 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-02-14 22:27 ` Robert P. J. Day
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070214193524.GF17598@distanz.ch \
--to=tklauser@distanz.ch \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.