From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: [PATCH] pretend-sha1: grave bugfix. Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:09:43 -0500 Message-ID: <20070216050943.GD28894@spearce.org> References: <7v3b56dhr1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 16 06:09:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HHvM0-0005u9-TN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:09:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423246AbXBPFJt (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:09:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423247AbXBPFJs (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:09:48 -0500 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:44588 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423246AbXBPFJs (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:09:48 -0500 Received: from cpe-74-70-48-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.48.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HHvLg-0005nY-PR; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:09:32 -0500 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ABF0420FBAE; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:09:43 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > * I wonder how recent merge-recursive with multiple merge bases > > (or an empty one) ever worked with this bug. Am I > > hallucinating? > > Probably the fact helped that merge-recursive only pretends > zero-sized blobs. Most definately. We never look at the pointer to an object's data if len == 0, which it does in this case of merge-recursive's empty tree. Aren't we using this for git-blame --contents? How'd that ever work for a non-empty file? -- Shawn.