From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Henri Hunnekens <henrihunnekens@gmail.com>
Cc: cpufreq <cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at drivers/acpi/osl.c:373! (acpi-cpufreq)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:52:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702161152.24710.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9f486400702160703pb3912e3m874daae8665c5cbb@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 16 February 2007 10:03, Henri Hunnekens wrote:
> Loading the acpi_cpufreq module reports a kernel bug using kernel
> version 2.6.20. versions 2.6.18 and older work fine.
> kernel BUG at drivers/acpi/osl.c:373!
> [<e0074455>] acpi_cpufreq_target+0x185/0x290 [acpi_cpufreq]
> [<c037881f>] __cpufreq_driver_target+0x3f/0x50
> [<c037a0de>] cpufreq_governor_performance+0x1e/0x30
> [<c0378984>] __cpufreq_governor+0x24/0xd0
> [<c0378e9b>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0xeb/0x140
> [<c03790fe>] cpufreq_set_policy+0x4e/0x80
> [<c0379d4a>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x31a/0x3e0
> [<c02bdfc9>] sysdev_driver_register+0x59/0xa0
> [<c037a027>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x67/0x100
> [<e007809d>] acpi_cpufreq_init+0x9d/0xa4 [acpi_cpufreq]
> [<c01423f7>] sys_init_module+0x137/0x1b90
> [<c0104620>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> =======================
> Code: f9 10 89 e5 53 89 c3 89 d0 74 12 83 f9 20 74 16 83 f9 08 75 16 0f b6 c2 89
> da ee eb 12 0f b7 c2 89 da 66 ef eb 09 89 da ef eb 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 5b 31 c0 5d
> c3 55 89 e5 5d c3 55 85 c0 89 e5 89 c1
> EIP: [<c027dbd9>] acpi_os_write_port+0x2d/0x36 SS:ESP 0068:dd3d1c8c
acpi_status acpi_os_write_port(acpi_io_address port, u32 value, u32 width)
{
switch (width) {
case 8:
outb(value, port);
break;
case 16:
outw(value, port);
break;
case 32:
outl(value, port);
break;
default:
373: BUG();
}
return AE_OK;
}
Well, acpi_os_write_port itself has not changed -- so it
is either acpi_cpufreq, cpufreq, or how they've read and interpreted the tables.
Please attach the output from acpidump > acpidump.out into a new bugzilla entry here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI
You can get acpidump from the latest pmtools here:
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/
Also, you can build with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y and boot with "acpi_dbg_layer=2"
plus "acpi_dbg_level=0xffffffff" and capture the console log.
(or you can set these values after booted in /proc/acpi just before
you try to load the module)
and, maybe some clues from the cpufreq subsystem will help.
cpufreq.debug=3 looks like it may give us a clue.
thanks,
-Len
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-16 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-16 15:03 kernel BUG at drivers/acpi/osl.c:373! (acpi-cpufreq) Henri Hunnekens
2007-02-16 16:52 ` Len Brown [this message]
2007-02-16 17:48 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-02-16 18:05 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-03-03 7:54 ` Henri Hunnekens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702161152.24710.lenb@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=henrihunnekens@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.