From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] killing the NR_IRQS arrays.
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:16:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702161316.41237.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1ire2e20p.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
> I expect the most it makes sense to aim for 2.6.22 are the genirq
> changes so the internal arch code is passing struct irq_desc
> everywhere internally.
Are there any livetime issues with passing pointers around?
e.g. what happens on APIC hotunplug etc.? We don't necessarily
support that yet, but for a big interface change it should
be probably kept in mind first.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-16 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-16 12:10 [RFC] killing the NR_IRQS arrays Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-16 12:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-16 12:16 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-02-16 15:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-16 12:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-16 15:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-16 15:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-16 22:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-18 21:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-19 0:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-27 20:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-28 0:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-28 7:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-28 8:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-28 13:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-28 12:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-28 13:02 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-28 13:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-01 10:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-16 18:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-02-16 19:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-16 19:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-02-16 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16 19:52 ` Russell King
2007-02-16 20:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16 20:59 ` Russell King
2007-02-16 22:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-17 1:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-17 4:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-17 9:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-17 21:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-18 6:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-18 20:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-17 9:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-17 21:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-18 3:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-16 22:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-17 8:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-17 21:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-18 4:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-18 19:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702161316.41237.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.