From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HI8Si-000644-Is for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:09:50 -0800 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HI8Sh-0000Bu-1e for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:09:40 -0800 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:02:04 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20070216190204.GB7481@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <11715068631914-git-send-email-blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20070214215123.57ef2d4a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070215170154.GA5641@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200702152005.56594.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200702152005.56594.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] x86_64: fix 2.6.18 regression - PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS should be accepted List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Blaisorblade Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:05:56PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > Jeff, I verified my patch is _almost_ enough for 2.6.18 for fully booting a > 32bit UML; on 2.6.18 I had to also add PTRACE_GET/SET_THREAD_AREA (this fix > was merged in 2.6.19) to avoid tons of TLS errors. I'm not seeing that. With the current set of patches, I have 32-bit UMLs happily booting on x86_64. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946078AbXBPTJm (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:09:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946223AbXBPTJm (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:09:42 -0500 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:41281 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946078AbXBPTJl (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:09:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:02:04 -0500 From: Jeff Dike To: Blaisorblade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [uml-devel] x86_64: fix 2.6.18 regression - PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS should be accepted Message-ID: <20070216190204.GB7481@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <11715068631914-git-send-email-blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20070214215123.57ef2d4a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070215170154.GA5641@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200702152005.56594.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200702152005.56594.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:05:56PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > Jeff, I verified my patch is _almost_ enough for 2.6.18 for fully booting a > 32bit UML; on 2.6.18 I had to also add PTRACE_GET/SET_THREAD_AREA (this fix > was merged in 2.6.19) to avoid tons of TLS errors. I'm not seeing that. With the current set of patches, I have 32-bit UMLs happily booting on x86_64. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com