All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Muizelaar <jeff@infidigm.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using sched_clock for mmio-trace
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:40:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070216194059.GF6425@infidigm.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73k5yhg9az.fsf@bingen.suse.de>

On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:02:44PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jeff Muizelaar <jeff@infidigm.net> writes:
> > 
> > The question is, what api should I be using? I need something that can
> > be called from inside interrupt handlers, and obviously the more
> > accurate and the lower the overhead the better.
> 
> Use do_gettimeofday(). sched_clock() is not for general use
> and only for some very limited use cases and will give you
> unexpected results in several cases.
> 
> There are a few cases where gtod is still a little slow, but these
> are being addressed. In many cases it is fast. In some hardware
> it stays slow, but there is not much that can be done about that
> because of the hardware design.
> 
> It works fine from interrupt handlers and other strange contexts.

Ok, I'll probably use it then. How does the overhead of calling
do_gettimteofday() compare to doing an mmio read/write over PCI express?
i.e. is it going to be a performance problem if I call do_gettimeofday
for every mmio read/write?

Also, is there any good reason blk-trace doesn't use do_gettimeofday()? 

-Jeff

      reply	other threads:[~2007-02-16 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-16  1:30 Using sched_clock for mmio-trace Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 16:30 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2007-02-16 17:45   ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-16 18:10     ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 18:28       ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-16 19:34         ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 21:06           ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-16 22:10             ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 22:47               ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-17  4:36                 ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 18:30   ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 18:44     ` Randy Dunlap
2007-02-16 19:55       ` Jeff Muizelaar
2007-02-16 20:03   ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-16 21:26     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2007-02-17 14:56       ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-17 15:19         ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-18 17:20           ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-16 20:02 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-16 19:40   ` Jeff Muizelaar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070216194059.GF6425@infidigm.net \
    --to=jeff@infidigm.net \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.