From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:56821 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161103AbXBTX6G (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:58:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:57:12 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 18/50] add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c Message-Id: <20070220155712.7b355161.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070221102027.52bf703a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <200702202159.l1KLxMcC021074@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20070221102027.52bf703a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, davidel@xmailserver.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, tony.luck@intel.com List-ID: On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:20:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:57:58 -0800 akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > > > > From: Davide Libenzi > > > > Add epoll compat_ code to kernel/compat.c. IA64 and ARM-OABI are currently > > using their own version of epoll compat_ code and they could probably wire to > > the new common code. > > So did you just ignore the discussion that went on about this patch and > the suggestions made (by me) and accepted by the author? That was a week ago and it's all gone quiet, so I guess I assumed we're good to go. > Nacked-by: Stephen Rothwell > > Whatever that means. OK, I'll drop it.