From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: all syscalls initially taking 4usec on a P4? Re: nonblocking UDPv4 recvfrom() taking 4usec @ 3GHz?
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:41:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070220164124.GA24930@2ka.mipt.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070220162714.GA3245@outpost.ds9a.nl>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:27:14PM +0100, bert hubert (bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl) wrote:
> I've done so, with some interesting results. Source on
> http://ds9a.nl/tmp/recvtimings.c - be careful to adjust the '3000' divider
> to your CPU frequency if you care about absolute numbers!
>
> These are two groups, each consisting of 10 consecutive nonblocking UDP
> recvfroms, with 10 packets preloaded. Reported is the number of microseconds
> per recvfrom call which yielded a packet:
>
> $ ./recvtimings
> 4.142333
It can be recvfrom only problem - syscall overhead on my p4 (core duo,
debian testing) is bout 300 usec - to test I ran
read('dev/zero', &data, 0)
in a loop.
Could you try to hack recvfrom() for your socket to always copy some
empty buffer and check the results without waiting for packet?
If you are not hurry I can test it myself tomorrow.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-20 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-19 23:14 nonblocking UDPv4 recvfrom() taking 4usec @ 3GHz? bert hubert
2007-02-19 23:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-20 8:04 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 10:50 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-20 16:27 ` all syscalls initially taking 4usec on a P4? " bert hubert
2007-02-20 16:41 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2007-02-20 17:02 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 17:11 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 17:18 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 11:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-21 11:34 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-20 18:42 ` Josef Sipek
2007-02-20 18:48 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 19:33 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 19:40 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-02-20 20:45 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 21:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-20 22:02 ` Rick Jones
2007-02-20 22:17 ` bert hubert
2007-02-20 22:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-20 22:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-21 16:25 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-20 22:46 ` Ian McDonald
2007-02-25 10:41 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-25 17:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-02-20 16:57 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070220164124.GA24930@2ka.mipt.ru \
--to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.