From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [Bridge] [PATCH 2/4] bridge: eliminate workqueue for carrier check
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:41:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070221224255.686055172@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070221224107.741532037@linux-foundation.org
[-- Attachment #1: bridge-port-carrier.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4593 bytes --]
Having a work queue for checking carrier leads to lots of race issues.
Simpler to just get the cost when data structure is created and
update on change.
Signed-off-by: StephenHemminger <shemminger@linux-foundtion.org>
---
net/bridge/br_if.c | 30 +++++-------------------------
net/bridge/br_notify.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
net/bridge/br_private.h | 4 +---
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
--- bridge.orig/net/bridge/br_if.c 2007-02-21 10:57:06.000000000 -0800
+++ bridge/net/bridge/br_if.c 2007-02-21 14:28:51.000000000 -0800
@@ -77,26 +77,15 @@
* Called from work queue to allow for calling functions that
* might sleep (such as speed check), and to debounce.
*/
-static void port_carrier_check(struct work_struct *work)
+void br_port_carrier_check(struct net_bridge_port *p)
{
- struct net_bridge_port *p;
- struct net_device *dev;
- struct net_bridge *br;
-
- dev = container_of(work, struct net_bridge_port,
- carrier_check.work)->dev;
- work_release(work);
-
- rtnl_lock();
- p = dev->br_port;
- if (!p)
- goto done;
- br = p->br;
+ struct net_device *dev = p->dev;
+ struct net_bridge *br = p->br;
if (netif_carrier_ok(dev))
p->path_cost = port_cost(dev);
- if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
+ if (netif_running(br->dev)) {
spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
if (netif_carrier_ok(dev)) {
if (p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
@@ -107,9 +96,6 @@
}
spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
}
-done:
- dev_put(dev);
- rtnl_unlock();
}
static void release_nbp(struct kobject *kobj)
@@ -162,9 +148,6 @@
dev_set_promiscuity(dev, -1);
- if (cancel_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check))
- dev_put(dev);
-
spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
br_stp_disable_port(p);
spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
@@ -282,7 +265,6 @@
p->port_no = index;
br_init_port(p);
p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK_NAR(&p->carrier_check, port_carrier_check);
br_stp_port_timer_init(p);
kobject_init(&p->kobj);
@@ -446,12 +428,10 @@
spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br);
br_features_recompute(br);
- if (schedule_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check, BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE))
- dev_hold(dev);
-
spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
dev_set_mtu(br->dev, br_min_mtu(br));
+
kobject_uevent(&p->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
return 0;
--- bridge.orig/net/bridge/br_notify.c 2007-02-21 10:57:06.000000000 -0800
+++ bridge/net/bridge/br_notify.c 2007-02-21 10:57:37.000000000 -0800
@@ -42,51 +42,48 @@
br = p->br;
- spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
switch (event) {
case NETDEV_CHANGEMTU:
dev_set_mtu(br->dev, br_min_mtu(br));
break;
case NETDEV_CHANGEADDR:
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
br_fdb_changeaddr(p, dev->dev_addr);
br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, p);
br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
break;
case NETDEV_CHANGE:
- if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP)
- if (schedule_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check,
- BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE))
- dev_hold(dev);
+ br_port_carrier_check(p);
break;
case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:
- if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP)
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
+ if (netif_running(br->dev))
br_features_recompute(br);
-
- /* could do recursive feature change notification
- * but who would care??
- */
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
break;
case NETDEV_DOWN:
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP)
br_stp_disable_port(p);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
break;
case NETDEV_UP:
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
if (netif_carrier_ok(dev) && (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP))
br_stp_enable_port(p);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
break;
case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
- spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
br_del_if(br, dev);
- goto done;
+ break;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
- done:
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
--- bridge.orig/net/bridge/br_private.h 2007-02-21 10:57:30.000000000 -0800
+++ bridge/net/bridge/br_private.h 2007-02-21 14:29:09.000000000 -0800
@@ -26,8 +26,6 @@
#define BR_PORT_BITS 10
#define BR_MAX_PORTS (1<<BR_PORT_BITS)
-#define BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE (HZ/10)
-
#define BR_VERSION "2.2"
typedef struct bridge_id bridge_id;
@@ -81,7 +79,6 @@
struct timer_list hold_timer;
struct timer_list message_age_timer;
struct kobject kobj;
- struct delayed_work carrier_check;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
@@ -172,6 +169,7 @@
int clone);
/* br_if.c */
+extern void br_port_carrier_check(struct net_bridge_port *p);
extern int br_add_bridge(const char *name);
extern int br_del_bridge(const char *name);
extern void br_cleanup_bridges(void);
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-21 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 22:41 [Bridge] [PATCH 0/4] bridge patches Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-21 22:41 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 1/4] bridge: get rid of miscdevice include Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-21 23:40 ` Marc.Obbad
2007-02-22 9:09 ` David Miller
2007-02-21 22:41 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2007-02-22 9:10 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 2/4] bridge: eliminate workqueue for carrier check David Miller
2007-02-21 22:41 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 3/4] bridge: make path cost setting persistent Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-27 17:52 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 3+/4] bridge: fix locking of set path cost Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-27 17:56 ` David Miller
2007-02-21 22:41 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 4/4] bridge: add flush attribute Stephen Hemminger
2007-02-22 9:11 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 0/4] bridge patches David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070221224255.686055172@linux-foundation.org \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bridge@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.