From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HK0OZ-0002cV-MS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:57:07 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HK0OX-0002ZP-RM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:57:06 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HK0OX-0002ZM-LA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:57:05 -0500
Received: from phoenix.bawue.net ([193.7.176.60] helo=mail.bawue.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HK0OX-0003US-6x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:57:05 -0500
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:54:44 +0000
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel][PATCH] qemu/hw mips_malta.c
Message-ID: <20070221225444.GA13373@networkno.de>
References: <E1HJVDQ-0002cL-6P@savannah.gnu.org> <45DCA8FB.7000809@weilnetz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45DCA8FB.7000809@weilnetz.de>
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Weil <Stefan.Weil@weilnetz.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Stefan Weil wrote:
> With your change, both serial ports are connected to
> the same virtual console which results in a funny
> but unwanted behaviour.
> 
> My patch fixes this.

Thanks. I expanded it slightly ...

> The patch also modifies the BIOS check. It is now
> possible to load a BIOS with less than 4 MiB.

... and made that a separate patch.

> What about my patch for EEPROM 24C01 / 24C02
> emulation needed for SDRAM SPD (dated 2007-01-23)?
> Is there any reason why it cannot be included in
> CVS HEAD?

Apparently fell through the cracks, please resend.


Thiemo