From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] mcp61 sensors support
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:41:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070222174114.3ee17450.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ef864c50702182307q4364770cj53c6dbab30fcd887@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:02:31 -0500, Thomas Garner wrote:
> > That being said, there are no sensors on the SMBus, only one EEPROM. If
> > there are sensors on your system, they have to be somewhere else, maybe
> > in the Super-I/O chip. Did you try running a recent version of
> > sensors-detect already? What did it find?
>
> (...)
> [root at ns ~]# sensors-detect
> # sensors-detect revision 4171 (2006-09-24 03:37:01 -0700)
>
> This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need
> to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe
> and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,
> unless you know what you're doing.
> (...)
> Some Super I/O chips may also contain sensors. We have to write to
> standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
> Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): y
> Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
> Trying family `ITE'... Yes
> Found unknown chip with ID 0x8726
> (logical device 4 has address 0x290, could be sensors)
Looks like the latest Super-I/O from ITE, the IT8726F, which we do not
support yet. At first sight it appears to be very similar to the
IT8716F, which we do support since 2.6.18, so it should be possible to
add support to the it87 driver easily. There are some technical details
which are unclear in the datasheet though, so I'm waiting a bit before
going on.
Do you have the possibility to recompile your kernel and lm_sensors
with some patches applied?
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-22 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-19 7:07 [lm-sensors] mcp61 sensors support Thomas Garner
2007-02-19 18:48 ` Jean Delvare
2007-02-19 19:39 ` Thomas Garner
2007-02-19 21:21 ` Jean Delvare
2007-02-19 21:36 ` Thomas Garner
2007-02-20 8:02 ` Jean Delvare
2007-02-21 2:55 ` Thomas Garner
2007-02-21 17:39 ` Jean Delvare
2007-02-22 3:02 ` Thomas Garner
2007-02-22 16:41 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2007-02-22 17:43 ` Thomas Garner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070222174114.3ee17450.khali@linux-fr.org \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.