All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luciano Ruete <luciano@lugmen.org.ar>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Split access, load balancing AND forwarding: HOW?
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:06:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702230006.53744.luciano@lugmen.org.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702211529590.9170@dellareas.intoweb.co.za>

On Thursday 22 February 2007 01:57, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
> From: "Ming-Ching Tiew" <mingching.tiew@redtone.com>
>
> > I would say it would be better to re-order the the iptables command :-
> >
> > #restore mark before ROUTING decision
> > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
> > #by-pass rules if it is already MARKed
> > iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m mark  --mark ! 0 -j ACCEPT
> > #1st packets(from a connection) will arrive here
> > iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MARK --set-mark 0x1
> > iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -j MARK --set-mark 0x2
> > iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j CONNMARK --save-mark
> >
> > ie restore-mark is moved to the top.
>
> On more careful reading, I am wondering why it is using POSTROUTING ?
>
> Shouldn't it all be PREROUTING ?

_NO_, cause i need that 'multipath routing' makes the 'weighted routing 
decision' in the first packet of each new connection. Once it is routed, all 
the other packets from same flow are hacked in PREROUTING, they mark are 
resotred and ip rule garantize that they will go by the same gateway as the 
first packet.

This solution works in theory and in practice, so plz, get your hands dirty 
before you post your next great idea.

-- 
Luciano
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-23  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-21 14:10 [LARTC] Split access, load balancing AND forwarding: HOW? Andrew McGill
2007-02-22  2:16 ` Luciano Ruete
2007-02-22  2:58 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2007-02-22  4:57 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2007-02-23  2:54 ` Luciano Ruete
2007-02-23  3:06 ` Luciano Ruete [this message]
2007-02-23  3:48 ` Roy Orpiano
2007-02-23  7:23 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2007-02-23 18:40 ` Alex Samad
2007-02-23 23:59 ` Ming-Ching Tiew

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200702230006.53744.luciano@lugmen.org.ar \
    --to=luciano@lugmen.org.ar \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.