From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:34:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20070227103407.GA17819@elte.hu> References: <20070225175559.GC12392@stusta.de> <20070227100202.GV3822@kernel.dk> <20070227102109.GG6745@elf.ucw.cz> <20070227103021.GA2250@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070227103021.GA2250@kernel.dk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Thomas Gleixner , Michal Piotrowski , Pavel Machek , Daniel Walker , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org * Jens Axboe wrote: > > > x60 doesn't resume from S2R either, it doesn't matter if = > > > CONFIG_NO_HZ is set or not though. 2.6.20 worked fine. > > = > > It somehow works for me. As long as I do not play with bluetooth and = > > suspend to disk... > = > It locks solid here on resume, going back to 2.6.20 makes it work = > perfectly again. In between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 some ACPI change = > broke resume, but that got fixed. Some other change later snuck in = > that broke it AGAIN for me, sigh. > = > I don't use bluetooth nor suspend to disk. resume is stock on my T60 too. So you mean v2.6.21-rc1 vanilla works = fine? Do you know a commit ID that works for sure? I'd like to bisect = this, but this way i might just find that ACPI change that got already = fixed later on (and then got re-broken). Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932987AbXB0KlP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 05:41:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932991AbXB0KlP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 05:41:15 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:45971 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932987AbXB0KlO (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 05:41:14 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:34:07 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jens Axboe Cc: Pavel Machek , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Thomas Gleixner , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Michal Piotrowski , Daniel Walker Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2) Message-ID: <20070227103407.GA17819@elte.hu> References: <20070225175559.GC12392@stusta.de> <20070227100202.GV3822@kernel.dk> <20070227102109.GG6745@elf.ucw.cz> <20070227103021.GA2250@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070227103021.GA2250@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.1 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -1.1 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0289] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jens Axboe wrote: > > > x60 doesn't resume from S2R either, it doesn't matter if > > > CONFIG_NO_HZ is set or not though. 2.6.20 worked fine. > > > > It somehow works for me. As long as I do not play with bluetooth and > > suspend to disk... > > It locks solid here on resume, going back to 2.6.20 makes it work > perfectly again. In between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 some ACPI change > broke resume, but that got fixed. Some other change later snuck in > that broke it AGAIN for me, sigh. > > I don't use bluetooth nor suspend to disk. resume is stock on my T60 too. So you mean v2.6.21-rc1 vanilla works fine? Do you know a commit ID that works for sure? I'd like to bisect this, but this way i might just find that ACPI change that got already fixed later on (and then got re-broken). Ingo