From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933283AbXCANFX (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:05:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933286AbXCANFW (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:05:22 -0500 Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:54566 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933283AbXCANFV (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:05:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:01:36 +0300 From: Evgeniy Polyakov To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Pavel Machek , Theodore Tso , Linus Torvalds , Ulrich Drepper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , Zach Brown , "David S. Miller" , Suparna Bhattacharya , Davide Libenzi , Jens Axboe , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3 Message-ID: <20070301130135.GA20554@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20070301092634.GB20171@elf.ucw.cz> <20070301094723.GJ7217@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070301095402.GA14603@elte.hu> <20070301105928.GA15709@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070301110022.GA28260@elte.hu> <20070301111629.GA27381@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070301114137.GB897@elte.hu> <20070301114734.GA3508@elte.hu> <20070301121020.GC20773@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070301124336.GA24464@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070301124336.GA24464@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (2ka.mipt.ru [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:02:02 +0300 (MSK) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 01:43:36PM +0100, Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote: > > * Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > I separated epoll and kevent servers, since originally kevent server > > included additional kevent features, but then new ones were added and > > I moved slowly to the similar to epoll case. > > i dont care whether they are separate or not - but you have not replied > to the request that there be a handle_web_request() function in /both/ > files, which is precisely the same function. I didnt ask you to merge > the two files - i only asked for the two web handling functions to be > one and the same function. They are not the same in general - if kevent is ready immediately, there will not be its removing from kevent tree, but current kevent server has it always not-immediately for lighttpd tests - so functions are the same: open() sendfile() cork_off close(fd) close(s) remove_event_from_the_kernel with the same parameters. > Ingo -- Evgeniy Polyakov