From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965115AbXCAOf0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:35:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965122AbXCAOf0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:35:26 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46333 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965115AbXCAOfY (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:35:24 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:27:56 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov , Pavel Machek , Theodore Tso , Linus Torvalds , Ulrich Drepper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , Zach Brown , "David S. Miller" , Suparna Bhattacharya , Davide Libenzi , Jens Axboe , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3 Message-ID: <20070301142756.GA22076@elte.hu> References: <20070301095402.GA14603@elte.hu> <200703011519.20001.dada1@cosmosbay.com> <20070301141637.GA20006@elte.hu> <200703011531.12818.dada1@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703011531.12818.dada1@cosmosbay.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Eric Dumazet wrote: > On my machines (again ...), ab is the slow thing... not the 'server' Evgeniy said that both in the epoll and the kevent case the server side CPU was 98%-100% busy - so inefficiencies on the client side do not matter that much - the server is saturated. It's that "kevent is 25% faster than epoll" claim that i'm probing mainly. Ingo