From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore To: Stephen Smalley Subject: Re: [RFC] SELinux: move security_skb_extlbl_sid() out of the security server Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:35:08 -0500 Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org References: <20070301173459.128882191@hp.com> <1172774649.19041.582.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1172774649.19041.582.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200703011435.08537.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Thursday, March 1 2007 1:44:09 pm Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 12:34 -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > > plain text document attachment (selinux-skbextlbl_move) > > As suggested, move the security_skb_extlbl_sid() function out of the > > security server and into the SELinux hooks file. > > Thanks, but one minor change suggested - rename the function, as > security_ prefix in selinux means security server (which in turn is > confusing since LSM also uses that prefix, but we had it first!). Since > it is static, you don't even need distinct namespace for it, so even > skb_extlbl_sid() is fine. Ah yes, thank you. I did that in the previous patchset but forgot to do so here. Personally I tend to like the security_/selinux_ prefix (it keeps my finger's busy ) so I'll just switch from security_ to selinux_. Patch coming in just a second. -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.