From: Horms <horms@verge.net.au>
To: "Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao" <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, judith@linux-foundation.org,
fastboot@lists.osdl.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH RFC 0/5] hard_smp_processor_id overhaul
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:23:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070302072348.GC21694@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1172733373.1498.264.camel@sebastian.intellilink.co.jp>
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:16:13PM +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> With the advent of kdump, the assumption that the boot CPU when running
> an UP kernel is always the CPU with a hardware ID of 0 (usually referred
> to as BSP on some architectures) does not hold true anymore. The reason
> being that the dump capture kernel boots on the crashed CPU (the CPU
> that invoked crash_kexec).
>
> As a consequence, the hardcoding of hard_smp_processor_id() to 0 on UP
> systems (see "linux/smp.h") is not correct.
>
> This patch-set does the following:
>
> 1- Remove hardcoding of hard_smp_processor_id on UP systems.
>
> 2- Ask the hardware when possible to obtain the hardware processor id on
> i386, x86_64, and ia64, independently of whether CONFIG_SMP is set or
> not.
>
> 3- Move definition of hard_smp_processor_id for the UP case to asm/smp.h
> on alpha, m32r, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, and um architectures. I
> guess that hardware features could be used to implement
> hard_smp_processor_id even in the UP case, but since I am not an expert
> in this architectures I just move the definition.
>
> The patches have been tested on i386, x86_64, and ia64.
Hi Fernando,
These patches seem find to me. Tested on ia64 (Tiger2)
Acked: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-02 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-01 7:16 [PATCH RFC 0/5] hard_smp_processor_id overhaul Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2007-03-01 14:06 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-03-02 3:10 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2007-03-02 4:14 ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2007-03-02 8:06 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2007-03-02 8:16 ` [PATCH] hard_smp_processor_id definition for UP systems without APIC (i386) Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2007-03-02 7:23 ` Horms [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070302072348.GC21694@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=judith@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.