From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc2-git3 soft lockup detected on CPU#0 (crash dump kernel)
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:51:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070305115111.GA10675@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bffcb0e0703050347j5169c672g19996d5c76707123@mail.gmail.com>
* Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> >also below is a softlockup-debug patch that might be useful, which adds
> >a tick/tock output so it spams the console once per second but can show
> >the dynamics of lockups (and other delays).
>
> I have applied this patch
> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.21-rc2-git3-kdump/log3.txt
thanks. It seems that the 'BUG: soft lockup detected' message does not
occur in this log though - and that there are bootup messages between
the two sysrq outputs:
[ 221.101833] skge eth1: disabling interface
[ 228.740911] audit(1173094442.943:11): user pid=3245 uid=0
auid=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 msg='changing system
time: exe="/sbin/hwclock"
(hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=console res=success)'
[ 233.148571] md: md1 in immediate safe mode
plus there's trouble with irq 10:
[ 132.013194] irq 10: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[ 132.072771] Disabling IRQ #10
that prompted you to enable irqpoll, right? So am i right that without
irqpoll there's no lockup?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-05 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-03 23:31 2.6.21-rc2-git3 soft lockup detected on CPU#0 (crash dump kernel) Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-04 14:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-04 14:36 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-04 15:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-04 16:28 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-04 16:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-04 16:47 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-04 17:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-04 17:15 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-04 17:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-05 8:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 10:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-05 10:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 11:47 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-05 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-03-05 12:04 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-05 12:21 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-05 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070305115111.GA10675@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.