From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:06:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20070306090612.GA25791@elte.hu> References: <20070227100202.GV3822@kernel.dk> <20070227102109.GG6745@elf.ucw.cz> <20070227103021.GA2250@kernel.dk> <20070227103407.GA17819@elte.hu> <20070227105922.GD2250@kernel.dk> <20070227111515.GA4271@kernel.dk> <20070301093450.GA8508@elte.hu> <20070302100704.GB2293@elf.ucw.cz> <20070305084257.GA4464@mellanox.co.il> <20070305101120.GA23032@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070305101120.GA23032@elte.hu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Auke Kok , Michal Piotrowski , Linus Torvalds , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , Pavel Machek , Jens Axboe , Thomas Gleixner , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > with real resume it takes even longer time - but i dont see where the = > delays come from in that case - i suspect it's SATA. update: Thomas' PIT/HPET resume-fix patch fixed the delay for me. Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933143AbXCFJHU (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 04:07:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933149AbXCFJHU (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 04:07:20 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:59113 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933152AbXCFJHR (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 04:07:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:06:12 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Pavel Machek , Jens Axboe , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Michal Piotrowski , Jeff Garzik , Auke Kok Subject: Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning Message-ID: <20070306090612.GA25791@elte.hu> References: <20070227100202.GV3822@kernel.dk> <20070227102109.GG6745@elf.ucw.cz> <20070227103021.GA2250@kernel.dk> <20070227103407.GA17819@elte.hu> <20070227105922.GD2250@kernel.dk> <20070227111515.GA4271@kernel.dk> <20070301093450.GA8508@elte.hu> <20070302100704.GB2293@elf.ucw.cz> <20070305084257.GA4464@mellanox.co.il> <20070305101120.GA23032@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070305101120.GA23032@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > with real resume it takes even longer time - but i dont see where the > delays come from in that case - i suspect it's SATA. update: Thomas' PIT/HPET resume-fix patch fixed the delay for me. Ingo