From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: ondemand as default governor Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:24:28 -0500 Message-ID: <200703070124.29058.lenb@kernel.org> References: <1172770914.10619.587.camel@d36.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1172770914.10619.587.camel@d36.suse.de> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, trenn@suse.de On Thursday 01 March 2007 12:41, Thomas Renninger wrote: > I just read in drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig: > > # Note that it is not currently possible to set the other governors > (such as ondemand) > # as the default, since if they fail to initialise, cpufreq will be > # left in an undefined state. > > Is this a bigger problem to solve? > Is there already someone working/thinking on/about a solution? > > Allowing this would be convenient... Yes, it would, then we could delete the other governors, and then delete the concept of multiple governors alltogether. -Len