From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.21-rc3] cpufreq: p4-clockmod.c compilation error
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:54:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070307065458.GA15453@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703062230001.1819@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:33:05PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o: In function `cpufreq_p4_verify':p4-clockmod.c:(.text.cpufreq_p4_verify+0x8): undefined reference to `cpufreq_frequency_table_verify'
> arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o: In function `cpufreq_p4_cpu_exit':p4-clockmod.c:(.text.cpufreq_p4_cpu_exit+0x8): undefined reference to `cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr'
> arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o: In function `cpufreq_p4_cpu_init':p4-clockmod.c:(.text.cpufreq_p4_cpu_init+0x13b): undefined reference to `cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr'
> :p4-clockmod.c:(.text.cpufreq_p4_cpu_init+0x163): undefined reference to `cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo'
> arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o: In function `cpufreq_p4_target':p4-clockmod.c:(.text.cpufreq_p4_target+0x21): undefined reference to `cpufreq_frequency_table_target'
> arch/x86_64/kernel/built-in.o: In function `k8nops':alternative.c:(.data+0x2b70): undefined reference to `cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs'
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=m
> CONFIG_X86_P4_CLOCKMOD=y
So P4_CLOCKMOD does a 'select CPU_FREQ_TABLE', but for some reason, that makes it =m,
not the same as whatever the option that is doing the 'select' is set to
(which is what I thought it did).
Given the cpufreq table code is tiny anyway, I'm wondering if its worth the
pain of having it be modular, instead just making it be built-in to cpufreq.
Give the diff below a shot?
Dave
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
index d155e81..74747d9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ config CPU_FREQ
if CPU_FREQ
config CPU_FREQ_TABLE
- tristate
+ bool
config CPU_FREQ_DEBUG
bool "Enable CPUfreq debugging"
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-07 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-07 6:33 [2.6.21-rc3] cpufreq: p4-clockmod.c compilation error David Rientjes
2007-03-07 6:54 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2007-03-07 7:11 ` David Rientjes
2007-03-08 8:14 ` [2.6 patch] x86_64: X86_P4_CLOCKMOD must select CPU_FREQ_TABLE Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070307065458.GA15453@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.