All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, safford@watson.ibm.com,
	serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjhall@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	zohar@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:42:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070308184202.GP6602@sequoia.sous-sol.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33939.11500.qm@web36612.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

* Casey Schaufler (casey@schaufler-ca.com) wrote:
> 
> --- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> > It's unfortunate, agreed, but
> > 
> > use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a
> > no-go.
> 
> You're going to have to justify this assertion.
> I know of at least one work-in-progress for which
> LSM works just fine. Not to mention the Integrity
> claims of SELinux.

Serge is referring to the objections to EVM/IMA
as LSM because it was not doing access control,
rather integrity measurements.  It's all in
somewhere the archives.

thanks,
-chris

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-08 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-08 16:03 [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks Mimi Zohar
2007-03-08 16:31 ` Chris Wright
2007-03-08 17:00   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-03-08 17:17     ` Chris Wright
2007-03-08 18:30     ` Casey Schaufler
2007-03-08 18:42       ` Chris Wright [this message]
2007-03-08 18:46       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-03-08 20:38         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-03-08 20:54           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-03-08 21:57           ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070308184202.GP6602@sequoia.sous-sol.org \
    --to=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=kjhall@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=safford@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.