From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pci: New PCI-E reset API Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:32:57 -0800 Message-ID: <20070309003257.GA31603@kroah.com> References: <45F075AA.502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46729 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752536AbXCIAes (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:34:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45F075AA.502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Brian King Cc: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:44:26PM -0600, Brian King wrote: > Greg, > > I saw you pulled this into your gregkh-2.6 tree. Does that mean > it is queued for 2.6.22? Yes it is. Is that a problem? thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.suse.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F80DDE33 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:34:52 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:32:57 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Brian King Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pci: New PCI-E reset API Message-ID: <20070309003257.GA31603@kroah.com> References: <45F075AA.502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <45F075AA.502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, paulus@samba.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:44:26PM -0600, Brian King wrote: > Greg, > > I saw you pulled this into your gregkh-2.6 tree. Does that mean > it is queued for 2.6.22? Yes it is. Is that a problem? thanks, greg k-h