From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: "Yuriy N\. Shkandybin" <jura@netams.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"bugme-daemon\@kernel-bugs\.osdl\.org"
<bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8132] New: pptp server lockup in ppp_asynctty_receive()
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:21:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070309102143.GD1662@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01a001c76226$c956b290$9b01a8c0@Empty>
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:40:04AM +0300, Yuriy N. Shkandybin wrote:
...
> I already have
> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
> # CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not set
> .config is at
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10660&action=view
> Also all information i've provied was recieved by serial console and it's
> not hand writing.
Maybe you cut too much (lines before a bug could be meaningful
- if there are some secret data - try to mask only them).
And there is no real lockdep diagnose, so I wasn't sure.
Dump registers at the end looks incomplete (no ESP info), too.
So, this all made me think - it's cut because it's from the screen.
Very sorry!!!
> I've checked logs and right before lockup there is oops in syslog
> Mar 5 21:50:44 vpn2 skb_under_panic: text:c02248a2 len:207 put:1
As a matter of fact the first bug is the most interesting
and everything after could be only some aftereffect.
This skb_under_panic message could change all diagnose:
it's not necessarily a locking problem.
On the other hand this could be even harder to diagnose
than locking...
> head:db96e22c data:db96e22b tail:db96e2fa end:db96e82c dev:<NULL>
> Mar 5 21:50:44 vpn2 ------------[ cut here ]------------
Why?! We don't even know if there was some config pending here.
> Mar 5 21:50:44 vpn2 kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:112!
...
> Another thing - when i`ve changed HZ from 100 too 300 there is no such
> lockups for few days.
You wrote it had been since several kernel releases, so it
shouldn't be the case, but anyway - it would be interesting
to check HZ 100 but with clean and more current kernel version
e.g. 2.6.21-rc3.
Thanks & regards,
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-09 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200703052226.l25MQUk4011469@fire-2.osdl.org>
2007-03-05 23:13 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 8132] New: pptp server lockup in ppp_asynctty_receive() Andrew Morton
2007-03-08 8:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-09 8:40 ` Yuriy N. Shkandybin
2007-03-09 10:21 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-03-09 13:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-09 13:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-19 7:49 ` Yuriy N. Shkandybin
2007-03-19 7:49 ` Yuriy N. Shkandybin
2007-03-28 8:19 ` [PATCH] ppp_generic: lockdep warning Re: [Bug 8132] New: pptp server lockup Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-28 8:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070309102143.GD1662@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=jura@netams.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.