From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751779AbXCIRS7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:18:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752685AbXCIRS7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:18:59 -0500 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35531 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751779AbXCIRS6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:18:58 -0500 From: Oliver Neukum Organization: Novell To: "Dmitry Torokhov" Subject: Re: refcounting drivers' data structures used in sysfs buffers Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:18:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: "Alan Stern" , "Maneesh Soni" , gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200703091745.00169.oneukum@suse.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703091818.57456.oneukum@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 9. März 2007 18:02 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov: > I think we already have all refcounting that is needed. What is > missing is subsystem-provided ->release() hooks for drivers to release > driver-specific resources when a device finally goes away. This is an interesting idea. Is it nice to pass through release() but not open() ? Regards Oliver