All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.22] remove Intel combined mode quirk
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:36:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703092136.28535.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070309160127.GA10226@havoc.gtf.org>


On Friday 09 March 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> Discussed for 2.6.21, but pushed back because the current SATA code
> had enough fun stuff to debug already.  Thus, just queued the following
> for 2.6.22 in libata-dev.git#upstream.
> 
> The nasty ____request_resource hack is finally gone.
> 
> In practical terms, this usually means that some combined mode users
> will have their SATA devices driven by the old-IDE driver rather than
> libata (because old-IDE is often non-modular, and thus probes first).
> 
> But really, these same users will IMO cheer the removal of the
> performance-killing split-driver configuration, so its a net win.
> And the code is smaller and more clean, with one less special case
> hack.
> 
>     libata/IDE: remove combined mode quirk
>     
>     Both old-IDE and libata should be able handle all controllers and
>     devices found using normal resource reservation methods.
>     
>     This eliminates the awful, low-performing split-driver configuration
>     where old-IDE drove the PATA portion of a PCI device, in PIO-only mode,
>     and libata drove the SATA portion of the /same/ PCI device, in DMA mode.
>     Typically vendors would ship SATA hard drive / PATA optical
>     configuration, which would lend itself to slow (PIO-only) CD-ROM
>     performance.
>     
>     For Intel users running in combined mode, it is now wholly dependent on
>     your driver choice (potentially link order, if you compile both drivers
>     in) whether old-IDE or libata will drive your hardware.
>     
>     In either case, you will get full performance from both SATA and PATA
>     ports now, without having to pass a kernel command line parameter.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>

Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

Thanks for fixing this.

Bart

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-09 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-09 16:01 [PATCH 2.6.22] remove Intel combined mode quirk Jeff Garzik
2007-03-09 16:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-09 17:29 ` Alan Cox
2007-03-09 16:33   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-09 19:56 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-03-09 20:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200703092136.28535.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.