All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	USB development list <linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: rmmod uhci_hcd -> BUG: atomic counter underflow
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:41:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070312214149.GA5950@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0703121715490.2480-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 05:25:09PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> 
> > Jiri Slaby napsal(a):
> > > Alan Stern napsal(a):
> > >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > >>> After rmmoding of uhci_hcd on fresh booted 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 I got this:
> > >>>
> > >>> BUG: atomic counter underflow at:
> > > [...]
> > >>>   [<c01db754>] kobject_put+0x14/0x16
> > >>>   [<c01db8a3>] kobject_unregister+0x22/0x25
> > >>>   [<c024c987>] bus_remove_driver+0x75/0x82
> > >>>   [<c024d3b8>] driver_unregister+0xb/0x18
> > >>>   [<c01e7020>] pci_unregister_driver+0x13/0x73
> > >>>   [<f88dbbd9>] uhci_hcd_cleanup+0xd/0x2d [uhci_hcd]
> > > [...]
> > >> Would it be possible for you to add the atomic counter underflow check 
> > >> to 2.6.21-rc3 and see if the problem still occurs?  If it doesn't, 
> > >> that's a good indication the USB stack isn't guilty -- the bus 
> > >> registration code hasn't changed for several kernel releases.
> > > 
> > > Yes.
> > 
> > I can confirm, that this issue went upstream and is currently present there.
> 
> I found the problem, but I don't know how to fix it.  Hopefully Greg or 
> Rusty will know.
> 
> There are two bugs in kernel/module.c:module_remove_driver(), right at the 
> end of the routine:
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Undo the additional reference we added in module_add_driver()
> 	 * via kset_find_obj()
> 	 */
> 	if (drv->mod_name)
> 		kobject_put(&drv->kobj);
> 

This code is reverted in 2.6.21-rc3-git7 as it was incorrect as you have
properly determined.

So, can people please test with a kernel newer than that?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-12 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-12 16:10 rmmod uhci_hcd -> BUG: atomic counter underflow Jiri Slaby
2007-03-12 16:26 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-12 16:29   ` Jiri Slaby
2007-03-12 16:50     ` Jiri Slaby
2007-03-12 21:25       ` Alan Stern
2007-03-12 21:41         ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-03-12 22:22           ` Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070312214149.GA5950@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.