From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Mobile Celeron Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:42:00 -0400 Message-ID: <20070313194200.GB10653@redhat.com> References: <50df9eb80703121320k182b0aa9x8fd7c6c7969384d7@mail.gmail.com> <20070313013801.GA5364@tatooine.rebelbase.local> <50df9eb80703131114wcff0a56g1d93499531eee9a@mail.gmail.com> <20070313190121.GD27471@redhat.com> <50df9eb80703131233u6b1a3c87r5a759cdf8e89c097@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50df9eb80703131233u6b1a3c87r5a759cdf8e89c097@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ralf Meyer Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:33:52PM +0100, Ralf Meyer wrote: > On 3/13/07, Dave Jones wrote: > > > I don't recall any celerons having frequency scaling. > > That's what I read all over the place by goo^W$searchengine_ing around. > > The funny thing thing is there is something called > "Intel830.PDK.V5.1.1Gold" from Intel which contains some small patches > to speedstep-smi and speedstep-lib which mention "Mobile Celeron" in > the comments. I's against a 2.6.10. But quite small. Not heard of this. Post the diff ? Might be something useful in it. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk