All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.30 cpu scheduler for mainline kernels
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:46:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070315174654.GB12447@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703151705.13761.kernel@kolivas.org>

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 05:05:13PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Thursday 15 March 2007 13:31, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > Just to see the % increase in number of context switches, I ran 8 infinite
> > loops (simple while(1); 's) and with 2.6.21-rc3 I see ~70 context switches
> > every second, whereas with RSDL I see ~530 context switches.
> 
> Thanks. If it's just that then scaling rr interval with cpus somewhat would
> help. If you could, the following patch just to test might confirm that.
> -#define RR_INTERVAL		((6 * HZ / 1001) + 1)
> +#define RR_INTERVAL		((12 * HZ / 1001) + 1)

Context switches now are ~370 per second. Still much above the regular ~70
we see in the mainline.

why do you say the rr_interval needs to be scaled with cpus? The basic point
in RSDL is, if we have more than one same priority task on a single logic
cpu, context switch happens every RR_INTERVAL (6 or 12 msec) whereas in
mainline it happens every 100 msec.

We need to minimize these context switches.

thanks,
suresh

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-15 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-11 23:58 RSDL v0.30 cpu scheduler for mainline kernels Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 23:46 ` David Miller
2007-03-13  3:05   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13  4:32     ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-13  5:03       ` [ck] " Felipe Alfaro Solana
2007-03-13  5:29       ` David Miller
2007-03-13 13:10       ` [ck] " michael chang
2007-03-13 15:35 ` [ck] " Ash Milsted
2007-03-13 15:46   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 15:53   ` Lee Revell
2007-03-13 17:45     ` Chris Friesen
2007-03-13 20:02       ` Lee Revell
2007-03-14  9:47       ` Ash Milsted
2007-03-15  2:31 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-03-15  6:05   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-15 17:46     ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2007-03-15 18:58       ` Ray Lee
2007-03-15 21:11         ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-15 21:12         ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-03-17 14:27 ` Szonyi Calin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070315174654.GB12447@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.