All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>,
	Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@indt.org.br>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-arm: wrong execution of post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are the same register
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:10:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703152110.39814.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdb0025f0703151332j36d31aa7i6ee2cea9bfb29a94@mail.gmail.com>

> > This is still wrong.
>
> So, is this a known bug?

Still wrong implies it's a bug, and your patch does not fix it properly.

> > The writeback must happen after the load.
>
> We code like this because
> - we didn't find this restriction in arm reference manual

It's the Abort model section you mention below.

> - the LLVM uses this instruction expecting a result like this

The compiler knows nothing about the abort behavior. The difference is only 
visible if the load faults.

> - That was the result that we got running these instructions in an OMAP1710

I suggest you check again. I'm fairly sure the arm926 implements the Base 
Restored abort model.

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-15 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-15 19:35 [Qemu-devel] qemu-arm: wrong execution of post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are the same register Lauro Ramos Venancio
2007-03-15 19:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Lauro Ramos Venancio
2007-03-15 20:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paul Brook
2007-03-15 20:32   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2007-03-15 21:10     ` Paul Brook [this message]
2007-03-15 21:19       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2007-03-15 21:55       ` Laurent Desnogues
2007-03-15 22:04         ` Paul Brook
2007-03-16 20:42           ` Lauro Ramos Venancio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200703152110.39814.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=lauro.venancio@indt.org.br \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.