From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: mercurial to git Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:53:54 -0400 Organization: Intel Open Source Technology Center Message-ID: <200703160053.54699.lenb@kernel.org> References: <20070306210629.GA42331@peter.daprodeges.fqdn.th-h.de> <20070315094434.GA4425@peter.daprodeges.fqdn.th-h.de> <20070315210406.GA8568@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Rocco Rutte , git@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 16 05:55:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HS4TX-0006WN-LS for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:55:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751710AbXCPEzT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:55:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751850AbXCPEzT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:55:19 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:42614 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751710AbXCPEzS (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:55:18 -0400 Received: from d975xbx2.site (c-65-96-213-102.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [65.96.213.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by hera.kernel.org (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l2G4s0lk004749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:55:10 GMT User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 In-Reply-To: <20070315210406.GA8568@thunk.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2842/Thu Mar 15 22:21:31 2007 on hera.kernel.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on hera.kernel.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thursday 15 March 2007 17:04, Theodore Tso wrote: > So it does handle octopus merges already (it has to, the ACPI folks > are very ocotpus merge happy :-). Well, just to set the record straight... So yes, I did a 12-way merge in the kernel a long while back on a lark. I don't generally do them any more in the official kernel tree because I think they make bisect more complicated than it needs to be. cheers, -Len