From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xemul@sw.ru, pj@sgi.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
winget@google.com, containers@lists.osdl.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Summary of resource management discussion
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:27:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070316145749.GA4760@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070316141915.GA6572@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:19:16PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > Do you see any drawbacks of doing like this? What will break if we do
> > this?
>
> looks good to me, except for the potential issue with
> the double indirection introducing too much overhear
Sure. I plan to get some numbers with and without the indirection in
nsproxy.
I was planning to get these numbers with a prelimnary CPU controller I wrote a
while back (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/28/236 and
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/26/12). Do you have plans to publish any CPU
controller in the short term as well?
--
Regards,
vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-16 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-12 12:42 Summary of resource management discussion Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-03-13 16:24 ` Herbert Poetzl
2007-03-13 17:58 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-03-13 23:50 ` Herbert Poetzl
2007-03-15 11:24 ` Paul Menage
2007-03-15 17:04 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-03-15 19:12 ` Paul Menage
2007-03-16 1:40 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-03-16 20:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-16 14:26 ` Herbert Poetzl
2007-03-16 14:19 ` Herbert Poetzl
2007-03-16 14:57 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-03-16 21:23 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070316145749.GA4760@in.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=winget@google.com \
--cc=xemul@sw.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.