From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Simon Peter <simon.peter@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Delays on "first" access to a NFS mount
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:47:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070316214737.GA3253@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070307230601.GX26553@fieldses.org>
First I'd like to apologize for jumping in a little late, but I have
been very busy at work the last weeks.
Then I'll try to put my repsones to most concerns here in one length
mail because there's a lot of different things talked about here
that are are all interwinded.
There's a lot of things about exporting handling that can be static
vs ondemand, kernel vs userspace etc.
- with NFSv4 there's a clear pseudo-filesystem structure where that
really should be represented using the kernel mount tables, or
to speak be a namespace reusing the infrastructure we have
- for NFSv2/3 that's not as important, but when we have to have
this namespace magic for NFSv4 anyway, it would be nice to reuse
it for NFSv3 as far as possible, e.g. serving older NFS client
from the same namespace as NFSv4 clients, even if only the actually
defined mountpoints without the pseudo root instead of the full
hiearchy that is visible
- once we're talking about mounting filesystems into specific places
we really should reuse all the existing excellent kernel code
to deal with this. Given that for NFSv4 we most likely want
to represent a different tree that the normal local filesystem views
that means a separate namespace. Note that we should have a way
for the administrator to easily see and modify this namespace to
not cause all too much trouble.
- using namespace and the kernel mount code means we need to have
at least enough information on where these mount points are in
kernel space.
- it does however not mean that we need to set up all these mount
points at boot time! We have a nice scheme to creates mounts
when a special follow_link operation that is for example used
in the nfs client for submount, or we could have some sort
of automounter that does userspace upcalls.
Does this give a better view of where I want to go?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-16 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-07 10:23 Delays on "first" access to a NFS mount Simon Peter
2007-03-07 12:38 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 13:22 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 15:06 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 15:10 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 15:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 18:44 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 20:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 21:46 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 22:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 23:19 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 22:09 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-08 15:49 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-09 13:02 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-09 14:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 20:31 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 20:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 21:07 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 21:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 21:23 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 21:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 22:37 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-07 23:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 23:39 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-08 5:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-08 5:42 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-08 13:43 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-03-08 21:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-09 15:02 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-03-16 21:47 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2007-03-16 21:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-16 21:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-07 23:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 23:51 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-08 4:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-08 13:27 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-03-08 21:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-07 22:15 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-07 21:40 ` Simon Peter
2007-03-07 22:17 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-07 22:36 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 22:48 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-07 22:56 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-03-07 22:12 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-07 22:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070316214737.GA3253@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=simon.peter@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.