From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
Cc: linux-pm <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] dynamic device power management proposal
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:35:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070322143541.GC7963@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703221526.07006.oneukum@suse.de>
Hi!
> > > > (With autosuspend, you can get situation when request from userland
> > > > comes in even when device is suspended; some devices will need
> > > > fixing).
> > >
> > > Currently, such requests are ignored. Is there any problem with that?
> >
> > You should probably autowake such device, no?
>
> Sorry, I misunderstood. IO requests wake an autosuspended device.
> A system wide suspend is ignored, if the device is already suspended.
Yes, that's okay. (ISTR problems when IO request oopsed an
autosuspended device).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-19 9:08 [RFC] dynamic device power management proposal Shaohua Li
2007-03-19 15:44 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-20 1:06 ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-20 14:58 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-21 1:43 ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-21 14:44 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-22 4:42 ` Len Brown
2007-03-22 11:56 ` Jim Gettys
2007-03-22 19:28 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 13:20 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 13:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 13:56 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 14:18 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 14:22 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 14:26 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 14:35 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-03-22 19:41 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 19:58 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 18:30 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-21 1:34 ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-21 15:21 ` Amit Kucheria
2007-03-21 21:49 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-21 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-21 21:39 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 3:09 ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-22 13:13 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 19:20 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 20:32 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-22 20:02 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 22:10 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-21 20:19 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-21 21:45 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-26 13:53 ` Amit Kucheria
2007-03-22 13:39 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-22 13:48 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 14:01 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 14:45 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-22 18:53 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 19:05 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-27 12:05 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-27 12:19 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 19:18 Scott E. Preece
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070322143541.GC7963@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.