From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HUWqW-0004y0-7K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:37:28 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HUWqU-0004tr-89
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:37:27 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUWqT-0004ti-TX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:37:25 -0500
Received: from phoenix.bawue.net ([193.7.176.60] helo=mail.bawue.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) id 1HUWod-0000vY-6y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:35:31 -0400
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:29:15 +0000
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: This project needs a stable branch
Message-ID: <20070322232915.GN2311@networkno.de>
References: <200703151111.04453.jseward@acm.org>
	<200703221847.49715.rob@landley.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0703230000170.4045@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
	<200703221923.09691.rob@landley.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200703221923.09691.rob@landley.net>
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 22 March 2007 7:00 pm, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tuesday 20 March 2007 6:19 pm, Julian Seward wrote:
> > > > Limited effort is always a problem, granted.
> > > > 
> > > > So here's a broader question, which I'm surprised nobody has asked
> > > > before (afaik).  Think forward to a hypothetical QEMU 1.0 release.
> > > > What criteria are required for such a release?
> > > 
> > > *cough* *cough* QOPS *cough* *cough*
> > 
> > *cough* *cough* patches? *cough* *cough*
> 
> Do you mean you're asking me to break up Paul Brook's QOPS tree at 
> https://nowt.dyndns.org and submit it to mainline?  I can do this thing, if 
> you really think it would help.  Seems a bit roundabout to submit Paul 
> Brook's work to Paul Brook, though, when he has CVS commit access and I 
> don't.

The patches need some updates AFAIK, and you might have more time than
Paul has.


Thiemo