From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1HUXm2-0001h3-02 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:36:54 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HUXm0-0001gj-21 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:36:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HUXly-0001gV-EX for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:36:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUXly-0001gS-8p; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:36:50 -0500 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HUXk7-0007cv-B4; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:34:55 -0400 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632D13CEF9F21; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:15:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFB03CEF0034; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:15:19 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: grub-devel@gnu.org Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:34:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <4600d7ad.0fbdf68c.519b.057c@mx.google.com> <200703230044.16884.okuji@enbug.org> <87zm64kdvo.wl@dekkers.cx> In-Reply-To: <87zm64kdvo.wl@dekkers.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703230134.53409.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=0.17.2 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Cc: xiongyi , Jeroen Dekkers , summer-of-code@gnu.org Subject: Re: Question about the GNU Grub ideas X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:36:52 -0000 On Friday 23 March 2007 01:22, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > The question is whether it's possible to formulate a project big > enough for Summer of Code and that also has clear goals, given that > the basic implementation of the port is already done? Good question. I think this task needs to be an assembly of smaller tasks, such as Legacy Boot support + CDROM boot support + Video support. Isn't it acceptable for SoC to do like this? Okuji