From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:36:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:61877 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20022514AbXCWXgs (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:36:48 +0000 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2NNahSi001608; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:36:44 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l2NNaeh8001606; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:36:40 GMT Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:36:40 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Ravi Pratap Cc: Atsushi Nemoto , miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: flush_anon_page for MIPS Message-ID: <20070323233639.GA517@linux-mips.org> References: <20070323190617.GA26884@linux-mips.org> <36E4692623C5974BA6661C0B18EE8EDF6CD3C5@MAILSERV.hcrest.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <36E4692623C5974BA6661C0B18EE8EDF6CD3C5@MAILSERV.hcrest.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 14654 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:17:25PM -0400, Ravi Pratap wrote: > > Yes, that's perfectly reproducable here (running a VSMP > > kernel on a 34K). > > So the fix I posted earlier was good but I did a few tweaks > > to it anyway. > > Will commit to all 2.6 -stable branch and master later. > > > Thanks so much! Will this go into 2.6.15 by any chance? I don't recall that there every has been such a kernel release ;-) But seriously, 2.6.15 is as dead as Tutankhamun. I've never maintained a 2.6.15-stable branch nor does anybody else still seem to be interested in wasting his time on it. And anyway flush_anon_page was only introduced in 2.6.17, so I've only fixed 2.6.17-stable and up. Ralf