From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWEdH-0005QU-T9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:34:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWEdC-0005Nl-RW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:34:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWEdC-0005Nc-HD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:34:46 -0500 Received: from return.false.org ([66.207.162.98]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HWEao-0003D8-UR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:32:19 -0400 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B5C4B267 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:32:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E134B262 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:32:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HWEam-0002kM-Me for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:32:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:32:16 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Increase max -kernel size Message-ID: <20070327163216.GA10491@caradoc.them.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:14:22PM +0200, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > Hi, > > The following patch increases max kernel size to 8 MB when qemu is invoked > with -kernel and -initrd. Otherwise, x86_64 kernel panics when loading the > initrd (e.g. /x86_64/isolinux/alt0/{vmlinuz,all.rdz}). When I talked to Fabrice about this he recommended looking at what other loaders (lilo, grub) do to avoid overwriting the kernel. I've been meaning to do that for months but never got around to it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery