From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:47:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH RESEND] lm-sensors: add dme1737 support Message-Id: <20070327184728.315da495.khali@linux-fr.org> List-Id: References: <191fb4ca0703261746s586b6c85t2a6aa27423c74e6d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <191fb4ca0703261746s586b6c85t2a6aa27423c74e6d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Juerg, On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:09:14 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > On 3/27/07, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:35:13 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > > > Yes, 0x73 is the one I wanted. My datasheet is at rev 0.4 > > > > I have rev 0.2. > > Man, where the heck do you get all these datasheets from? :-) I don't remember. All I know is that I tagged it "do not distribute", which means that it's not public. > > > If you don't feel comfortable with the new registers I don't have a > > > problem going back to the original register set. I just thought > > > something a little bit more unique and meaningful makes sense. > > > > I don't care either way as long as you know what you're doing. We can > > always change it in the future if problems arise. So I've applied your > > patch. > > > > About the Asus A8000, will it be detected as an SMSC DME1737 with the > > current code in sensors-detect? Or do we need dedicated detection? > > > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2005-June/012777.html > > Yes, it will work just fine for the A8000. OK, great. I've updated our Devices wiki page accordingly. I hope to find some time to take a first look at your driver by the end of the week. Can't promise anything, though. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors