From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: group descriptor contents and LAZY_BG Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:14:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20070328131439.GA2913@thunk.org> References: <20070324214056.GL5967@schatzie.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Girish Shilamkar , Kalpak Shah To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:51907 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750930AbXC1NOn (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:14:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070324214056.GL5967@schatzie.adilger.int> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 03:40:57PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > What do you think for the GDT_CSUM feature that we initialize the group > descriptors as if the group had actually been formatted? I think that makes a huge amount of sense. Initializing the group descriptors isn't want takes the huge amount of time; it's initializing the bitmap blocks and inode table. - Ted