From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <okuji@enbug.org>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Two SoC ideas
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:08:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703282108.09722.okuji@enbug.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e12e59640703280406w35530e8eyc79a856da9f55c95@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 13:06, Wei Shen wrote:
> Your are absolutely right. But I am not an expert on Grub.
Note that nobody is an expert from the beginning.
> I think the most important that Google SoC gives a student is not money,
> but a opportunity to participate and obtain help.
IMHO, SoC has two significant effects.
One of them is definitely money. Money is not a good motivation in software
development, but money can allocate your time.
The other is advertisement. Even if people do not go to a museum usually, some
of them might feel that they want to go, when a special exhibition is
planned. SoC has the same effect. Even if people do not look at free software
development usually, some of them might feel that they want to participate,
when this kind of event is planned.
Besides these, however, I see no difference between mentees in SoC and other
contributors. After all, our project is Free Software. You are always free to
take part in our development, whenever you would feel to do so. Help? Yes, we
do, as much as we can practically, regardless of whether you are paid or not.
I don't know if Jeroen is planning to take some money or not, but I myself did
not take any cent of money from last year's SoC. So, from my point of view,
there was no real difference between a mentee and another contributor. So I
have helped all contributors equally.
Briefly, your contribution is welcome, no matter whatever you do with SoC.
Okuji
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-28 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <e12e59640703230823l6719006blafc599e017b367e3@mail.gmail.com>
2007-03-23 15:46 ` Two SoC ideas Wei Shen
2007-03-23 16:22 ` colyli
2007-03-23 17:30 ` Wei Shen
2007-03-23 17:49 ` coly
2007-03-24 16:12 ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-03-26 5:24 ` LVM as root device Juan Pedro Paredes
2007-03-28 18:53 ` Yoshinori K. Okuji
2007-04-10 23:32 ` Jerone Young
2007-03-24 22:57 ` Two SoC ideas Yoshinori K. Okuji
2007-03-25 5:35 ` coly
2007-03-28 18:47 ` Yoshinori K. Okuji
2007-03-25 20:29 ` James Youngman
2007-03-28 2:24 ` Wei Shen
2007-03-28 4:57 ` coly
2007-03-28 11:06 ` Wei Shen
2007-03-28 19:08 ` Yoshinori K. Okuji [this message]
2007-03-29 3:17 ` Wei Shen
2007-04-07 13:07 ` Yoshinori K. Okuji
2007-04-10 13:41 ` Marco Gerards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703282108.09722.okuji@enbug.org \
--to=okuji@enbug.org \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.