From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933372AbXC1WB2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:01:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933589AbXC1WB2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:01:28 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.93.40.71]:60409 "EHLO holomorphy.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933372AbXC1WB1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:01:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:01:31 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Christoph Lameter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC] i386: Remove page sized slabs for pgds and pmds Message-ID: <20070328220131.GF2986@holomorphy.com> References: <20070328205055.GX8915@holomorphy.com> <20070328212459.GY8915@holomorphy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:38:55PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > No that was described in the patch. Quote: > "i386 only provides support for caching constructed pgd and pmds. These > are comparatively rare to ptes so it is no surprise that the current > approach has only minimal effect. ...." And where was the mention of this being a patch I sent you in a private reply verbatim, and furthermore asked you not to post? -- wli