From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Linda Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>, Oliver Joa <oliver@j-o-a.de>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Corrupt XFS -Filesystems on new Hardware and Kernel
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:14:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070329111407.GA9959@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070329093400.GB14616@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
On Thu, Mar 29 2007, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Oliver Joa wrote:
> > >>eason or another, xfs has detected a corrupted on-disk inode format
> > >>which it cannot recognize, and shuts down.
> > ----
> > Oh, one other thing that may not apply in your case, but may.
> > Does your SATA disk support write caching? Does it support
> > something called a barrier function? (not real clear on all
> > the ways this can go wrong, but I believe barriers are supposed
> > to guarantee previous data has been fixed on disk (not in write
> > cache). If the SATA controller issues a reset, it may very well
> > purge the write cache. Theoretically, I can think of a _possibility_,
> > that the reset disk would purge the write cache and the barrier
> > indicator would tell xfs to resume writing. From a recent thread
> > on the xfs list, it would appear this could be a "bad" thing (like
> > crossing the streams ala "ghostbusters", but in a data-integrity
> > context).
> As far as I can remember, barrier does not mean that data is fixed on
> disk. It is only a command that forces all the writes before the barrier
> to be performed before all the writes after the barrier. So this is more
> an ordering restriction than a data integrity thing...
A barrier write guarentees both data before barrier is on disk, as well
as the barrier itself when completion is signalled.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-29 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-27 16:16 Corrupt XFS -Filesystems on new Hardware and Kernel Oliver Joa
2007-03-27 19:13 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2007-03-28 7:46 ` Oliver Joa
2007-03-28 9:30 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-03-28 10:59 ` Oliver Joa
2007-03-28 11:13 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-03-28 11:31 ` David Chinner
2007-03-28 12:42 ` Oliver Joa
2007-03-28 14:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-03-28 19:56 ` Oliver Joa
2007-03-29 0:21 ` Linda Walsh
2007-03-29 2:34 ` Linda Walsh
2007-03-29 9:34 ` Jan Kara
2007-03-29 11:14 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-03-28 23:46 ` David Chinner
2007-03-30 13:45 ` Oliver Joa
2007-04-11 7:36 ` Oliver Joa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070329111407.GA9959@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@tlinx.org \
--cc=oliver@j-o-a.de \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.