From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:12:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20070402181238.GB15273@kernel.dk> References: <20070403012747O.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20070403014349E.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1175533302.3680.31.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <20070402221349L.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([62.242.22.158]:5324 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965641AbXDBSSN (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:18:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070402221349L.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, hch@infradead.org, dougg@torque.net, James.Smart@Emulex.Com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 03 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > From: James Bottomley > Subject: Re: SMP pass through interface via bsg > Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:01:41 -0500 > > > On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 01:43 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > OK. I found another bug in smp_test tool (sends bogus response buffer > > > len to kernel). I've uploaded a new patch: > > > > > > http://zaal.org/bsg/smp-test2.diff > > > > That sort of works; you have a final bug in that the manufacturer info > > response frame is 64 bytes, not 128 bytes, but with that corrected > > everything goes through and I get the result back: > > > > hobholes:~# /home/jejb/git/sgv4-tools/smp_test /sys/class/bsg/expander-2\:0 > > SAS-1.1 format: 0 > > vendor identification: LSILOGIC > > product identification: SASx12 A.0 > > product revision level: > > > > So we can class this one as a success ... > > > > Thanks! > > Great! Thanks. I'll try to finish the mpt driver's hook > sometime. Finally, We have a bsg user (though it also needs proper > bidi support). > > Jens, what remains to be done before bsg is merged into mainline? Well the bi-dir stuff and sg v4 design were the two bits that needed to get done before pushing bsg made sense, so we are getting there... Probably a 2.6.23 target, leaving the bidi bits a revision cycle to get sorted out. -- Jens Axboe