From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Koch?= Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 09:26:02 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] What about i2c_smbus_read_block_data() ? Message-Id: <200704081126.02563.hjk@linutronix.de> List-Id: References: <200704042149.21264.hjk@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <200704042149.21264.hjk@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Am Sonntag 08 April 2007 10:58 schrieb Jean Delvare: > > I have a different variant of this patch in my local tree, which takes > the i2c-core changes that happened in the meantime into account. I'm > attaching it to this post if someone want to take a look and/or > comment.=20 Looks allright to me. > In fact I think I'll schedule this patch for merge into 2.6.22=20 > regardless of the state of the lm93 driver patch.=20 Good idea. I will submit a first version of the LM93 patch next Thursday or Friday. It's ready, but I cannot test it until then. > I'm a bit tired to=20 > have to maintain that patch off-tree and to see people waste their time > wondering where that function has gone, searching the mailing list for > explanations, finding the patch and resubmitting it. We all have better > things to do. I second that. > > Anyway, the key point for Hans-J=FCrgen is: you can assume that function > i2c_smbus_read_block_data() will be available to you when your lm93 > driver patch is merged upstream. Fine. Thanks, Hans _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors