From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] swsusp: Use rbtree for tracking allocated swap
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 19:02:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704081902.35857.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070408125636.GB4404@ucw.cz>
On Sunday, 8 April 2007 14:56, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Some time ago we discussed the possibility of simplifying the swsusp's approach
> > towards tracking the swap pages allocated by it for saving the image (so that
> > they can be freed if there's an error).
> >
> > I think we can get back to it now, as it is a nice optimization that should
> > allow us to use less memory (almost always) and improve performance a bit.
> >
>
> Well, I do not think you can measure the difference, but...
As far as the memory usage is concerned, I can. :-) Usually, it takes 1 extent
(40 B on x86_64) to register all of the allocated swap pages. If bitmaps are
used, we need as many bits as there are swap pages available (for 1 GB swap
and 4 KB pages that would be ~250000 bits, which gives ~8 pages, and we can
save more than 800 extents using that much memory).
> > kernel/power/power.h | 27 +---------
> > kernel/power/swap.c | 18 +-----
> > kernel/power/swsusp.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> > kernel/power/user.c | 22 +-------
> > 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
>
> ....as it removes code... I think we can do that. But it is 2.6.23+
> material.
Yes, I think so, but still we can ask Andrew to include it into -mm earlier? ;-)
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-08 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-07 21:20 [RFC][PATCH -mm] swsusp: Use rbtree for tracking allocated swap Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-07 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-07 22:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-04-07 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-07 23:42 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-04-08 16:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-08 21:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-04-09 13:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-09 21:00 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-04-08 12:56 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-08 17:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-04-09 12:39 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-10 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704081902.35857.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.