From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Andreas Herrmann" <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: prevent auto select of mwait_idle for AMD CPUs
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:11:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704102011.18752.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070410172425.GE24680@alberich.amd.com>
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 19:24:25 Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> This fix is needed for AMD family 10h CPUs.
>
> It prevents auto select of mwait_idle for AMD CPUs.
> MWAIT does not enter C-states on family 10h and more
> power saving is reached by entering C1 with
> default_idle.
>
> The patch also adds an idle=mwait command line option
> to select mwait_idle for benchmarking.
I already did my own patch earlier. Applied for reference.
-Andi
Don't use MWAIT on AMD Family 10/11
It doesn't put the CPU into deeper sleep states, so it's better to use the standard
idle loop to save power. But allow to reenable it anyways for benchmarking.
I also removed the obsolete idle=halt
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Index: linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -673,8 +673,15 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters.
idebus= [HW] (E)IDE subsystem - VLB/PCI bus speed
See Documentation/ide.txt.
- idle= [HW]
- Format: idle=poll or idle=halt
+ idle= [X86]
+ Format: idle=poll or idle=mwait
+ Poll forces a polling idle loop that can slightly improves the performance
+ of waking up a idle CPU, but will use a lot of power and make the system
+ run hot. Not recommended.
+ idle=mwait. On systems which support MONITOR/MWAIT but the kernel chose
+ to not use it because it doesn't save as much power as a normal idle
+ loop use the MONITOR/MWAIT idle loop anyways. Performance should be the same
+ as idle=poll.
ignore_loglevel [KNL]
Ignore loglevel setting - this will print /all/
Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/amd.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
extern void vide(void);
__asm__(".align 4\nvide: ret");
+int force_mwait __initdata;
+
static void __cpuinit init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
u32 l, h;
@@ -241,6 +243,9 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd(struct cp
if (cpuid_eax(0x80000000) >= 0x80000006)
num_cache_leaves = 3;
+
+ if ((c->x86 == 0x10 || c->x86 == 0x11) && !force_mwait)
+ clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT, &c->x86_capability);
}
static unsigned int __cpuinit amd_size_cache(struct cpuinfo_x86 * c, unsigned int size)
Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
@@ -272,25 +272,24 @@ void __devinit select_idle_routine(const
}
}
-static int __init idle_setup (char *str)
+static int __init idle_setup(char *str)
{
- if (!strncmp(str, "poll", 4)) {
+ if (!strcmp(str, "poll")) {
printk("using polling idle threads.\n");
pm_idle = poll_idle;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SMP
if (smp_num_siblings > 1)
printk("WARNING: polling idle and HT enabled, performance may degrade.\n");
#endif
- } else if (!strncmp(str, "halt", 4)) {
- printk("using halt in idle threads.\n");
- pm_idle = default_idle;
- }
+ } else if (!strcmp(str, "mwait"))
+ force_mwait = 1;
+ else
+ return -1;
boot_option_idle_override = 1;
- return 1;
+ return 0;
}
-
-__setup("idle=", idle_setup);
+early_param("idle", idle_setup);
void show_regs(struct pt_regs * regs)
{
Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
@@ -288,16 +288,18 @@ void __cpuinit select_idle_routine(const
static int __init idle_setup (char *str)
{
- if (!strncmp(str, "poll", 4)) {
+ if (!strcmp(str, "poll")) {
printk("using polling idle threads.\n");
pm_idle = poll_idle;
- }
+ } else if (!strcmp(str, "mwait"))
+ force_mwait = 1;
+ else
+ return -1;
boot_option_idle_override = 1;
- return 1;
+ return 0;
}
-
-__setup("idle=", idle_setup);
+early_param("idle", idle_setup);
/* Prints also some state that isn't saved in the pt_regs */
void __show_regs(struct pt_regs * regs)
Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ int bootloader_type;
unsigned long saved_video_mode;
+int force_mwait __initdata;
+
/*
* Early DMI memory
*/
@@ -604,6 +606,10 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd(struct cp
/* RDTSC can be speculated around */
clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC, &c->x86_capability);
+
+ /* Family 10/11 don't support C states in MWAIT so don't use it */
+ if ((c->x86 == 0x10 || c->x86 == 0x11) && !force_mwait)
+ clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT, &c->x86_capability);
}
static void __cpuinit detect_ht(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
Index: linux/include/asm-i386/processor.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/asm-i386/processor.h
+++ linux/include/asm-i386/processor.h
@@ -779,4 +779,6 @@ extern int sysenter_setup(void);
extern void cpu_set_gdt(int);
extern void cpu_init(void);
+extern int force_mwait;
+
#endif /* __ASM_I386_PROCESSOR_H */
Index: linux/include/asm-x86_64/proto.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/asm-x86_64/proto.h
+++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/proto.h
@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ extern int gsi_irq_sharing(int gsi);
extern void smp_local_timer_interrupt(void);
+extern int force_mwait;
+
long do_arch_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int code, unsigned long addr);
void i8254_timer_resume(void);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-10 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-10 17:24 [PATCH] x86_64: prevent auto select of mwait_idle for AMD CPUs Andreas Herrmann
2007-04-10 17:31 ` Andreas Herrmann
2007-04-10 18:11 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-04-11 14:46 ` Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704102011.18752.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.