From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB50DDF58 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:30:57 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:48:09 -0500 To: Kim Phillips Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc: document max-speed and interface-type properties Message-ID: <20070410224809.GA20848@lixom.net> References: <20070410165639.1b619c34.kim.phillips@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070410165639.1b619c34.kim.phillips@freescale.com> From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 04:56:39PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > Since ucc_geth is being migrated to use the phylib, the existing > (undocumented) 'interface' property is being deprecated in favour > of unconjoined variations 'max-speed' and 'interface-type'. > > max-speed is necessary for QE UEC devices that do not make that > information available through their programming model. Do you really need to set max speed for devices that are at the default max speed for the interface type? Seems redundant. If for example there's an rgmii interface that for some reason only can handle 100Mbit, that'd be different. -Olof