All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@novell.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 tsc: remove xtime_lock'ing around cpufreq notifier
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:36:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704121136.03098.ak@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070411173902.b2a9ab9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>


> OK, so I resurrected x86_64-mm-sched-clock-share.patch and
> x86_64-mm-sched-clock64.patch.  The x86_64 box hangs on boot when using
> netconsole and printk timestamps too.  Removing "time" from the kernel boot
> command line prevents that.

Ah. But ktime_get shouldn't printk. Or did you change that?

> 
> This explains why the hang only happens with
> x86_64-mm-log-reason-why-tsc-was-marked-unstable.patch applied, too: that
> patch must be triggering a printk inside xtime_lock.
> 
> Does someone want to cook up a lockless printk_clock() for i386 and x86_64?

Just use jiffies directly in printk. That's only HZ accurate, but should
be good enough for printk.  

One could use pure monotonic xtime as fallback instead of ktime_get in sched_clock. 
The trouble is  just that they might cause sched_clock to go backwards during 
a temporary instability period (cpufreq change) because the xtime will be 
always a bit behind the TSC and a TSC->xtime conversion will lose time.
At least the scheduler doesn't handle backwards time warp on a CPU gratefully.
Ok I guess it could  return max(last_value_before_instability, xtime) 

-Andi



  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-12  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-11 16:29 [PATCH] i386 tsc: remove xtime_lock'ing around cpufreq notifier Daniel Walker
2007-04-11 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 20:54   ` Daniel Walker
2007-04-11 21:33     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12  0:39       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12  9:36         ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-04-12 16:23           ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 16:45             ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 17:00               ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 17:43                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 17:46                   ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 17:52                   ` Daniel Walker
2007-04-12 17:55                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 18:27                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 19:41                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 19:43                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 17:41               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 17:45                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 19:46                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 20:15                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 17:17         ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200704121136.03098.ak@novell.com \
    --to=ak@novell.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.